Sexual Assault, Attempted Obstruction, Orders Violation | Case Results

Case Results

  • Not guilty on sexual assault charges
  • Guilty of fraternization
  • Sentenced to reprimand 
  • No jail time
  • No sexual offender registration
  • No punitive discharge

Location

  • Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan

Branch of Military and Rank 

  • Marine
  • E-6

Charges:

In this “Not Guilty” Sexual Assault case, Mr. Bilecki exposed yet another false allegation of sexual assault followed by one of the sloppiest and pre-conceived investigations seen in years.

A junior Marine was flirting with a married Staff Sergeant, and when the Staff Sergeant confronted her on the matter, she claimed that he sexually assaulted her. The alleged victim claimed that the Client came into her barracks room around 0600hrs and began to sexually assault her, while she was talking on the phone with her parents back in the States.

The claim, on its face, lacked credibility. The alleged victim also claimed that the Client sexually harassed and stalked her months prior to the alleged sexual assault. At trial, she testified that she gave the Staff Sergeant, “stalker status,” whatever that meant.

Mr. Bilecki tried the case and exposed an NCIS investigation that failed to administer even the most basic steps to uncover exculpatory evidence. At trial, Mr. Bilecki cross-examined the lead NCIS agent and revealed that law enforcement:

  • Did not begin its investigation until nearly five weeks after the allegation,

  • Made no attempt to recover any physical evidence from the crime scene,

  • Failed to collect the alleged victim’s clothing,

  • Did not collect DNA, and

  • Made no effort to retrieve any phone records.

All of which would have been exculpatory.

Law enforcement also interviewed the Client, and during the interview, he pleaded with NCIS to review his cell phone. The phone contained numerous text messages from the “victim” to the Client, saying things like “Let’s f***.”

Instead of collecting the phone as evidence – which in this case would have proved that the “victim” had lied to law enforcement and made a false allegation – they photographed the Client’s cell phone and then failed to place the photos into the case file.

NCIS decided early on that the Client was guilty, and it took no steps to find exculpatory evidence, or even use such evidence after it was delivered to them. At the Article 32 hearing, Mr. Bilecki cross-examined the alleged victim about her relationship with our client. He managed to get her to admit that she sent the Client a text message saying “Let’s f***” just prior to when she claims that our client barged into her room and sexually assaulted her (while she was on the phone with her parents.)

After the Article 32, Mr. Bilecki demanded that her cell phone undergo forensic review by law enforcement so that the exculpatory text messages could be recovered. Conveniently, between the date of the Article 32 and when the alleged victim’s phone was seized two weeks later, the pin connectors on her iPhone were broken.

The defense contended that the alleged victim intentionally broke her phone so that the messages could not be recovered. NCIS, unbelievably, did not send the phone to UCACIL, DCFL or any other lab to recover the data, but rather looked at the phone, saw the pin connector was broken and did nothing. Mr. Bilecki exposed all of this during cross-examination.

Also, interesting in the case was the voluminous amount of coaching of the alleged victim. During her testimony, she quickly answered every question from the prosecutor, in a transparent demonstration of prosecution preparation and rehearsal.

However, during cross-examination, whenever Mr. Bilecki asked her a tough question she would respond with, “I don’t remember” or “I don’t recall”. The defense counted at least 35 times when the alleged victim answered, “I don’t remember”, or, “I don’t recall”, during cross-examination.

Many of these memory lapse responses were to simple questions, the truth of which would have revealed the falsity of the allegations.

After a weeklong trial, the panel acquitted the Client of all sexual assault charges.

Result:  

  • Not guilty on sexual assault charges
  • Guilty of fraternization
  • Sentenced to reprimand 
  • No jail time
  • No sexual offender registration
  • No punitive discharge
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google+
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email
Scroll to Top

Request A FREE Case Evaluation

You deserve a fighting chance on your day in court. When it comes time to decide who your attorney will be to defend your UCMJ charges, make that decision count.***

*** All information submitted will be kept confidential and private. An attorney client relationship is not established by submitting this initial contact information to our office.