UCMJ Article 81: Conspiracy
Any Service Member of the United States military that conspires with another person or persons to commit a crime may faces charges under Article 81 of the UCMJ: Conspiracy. Conspiracy is a separate crime from the original offense which allows prosecutors additional leverage in securing the harshest possible sentencing at your court-martial.
- You may not have taken part in the crime itself—you could be punished in equal measure to the individual or individuals whose actions broke the law.
- There are very few limitations to your punishment under article 81. You could face max sentencing for felony level charges, including jail time, reduction to E-1 along with a dishonorable discharge.
- You will be branded a criminal long after your military career is over. Your criminal history will be available for anyone to see with a simple Google search.
Allegations of conspiracy are terrible. But they pale in comparison to being found guilty of those allegations in a military court martial.
Protecting yourself from charges of conspiracy should be your top priority. Defend your future and your freedoms with the help of Bilecki & Tipon today.
Defining the Elements of Article 81: Conspiracy
Article 81 is comprised of two elements which must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt by prosecutors to convict you of the crime:
- The accused must conspire with one or more other individuals to commit a crime under the articles of the UCMJ.
- An overt action must have been committed—either by the accused or by a fellow co-conspirator—which helps bring about the object of the conspiracy.
These two elements may seem simple enough on their face. But the details of each show a different story, one which is favorable to the prosecutors attempting to convict you:
- Prosecutors don’t need to identify any of your fellow co-conspirators to convict you of conspiracy.
- Prosecutors simply must show that the co-conspirators arrived at a “common understanding to accomplish the object of the conspiracy.”
- Any overt action taken to advance the goal of the conspiracy is enough to secure a conviction. The overt act doesn’t even have to be unlawful in nature.
Fighting Back Against an Article 81: Conspiracy
You are up against a tough opponent that understands the UCMJ and the charges you face. You’ll have to fight fire with fire with an aggressive court martial defense lawyer if you hope to beat the charges against you and secure a not-guilty verdict.
Here are just a few of the options Bilecki & Tipon has at its disposal to fight back against charges of conspiracy:
- Charges of conspiracy must involve an overt act (unless it is a conspiracy charge under Article 134) and prosecutors must prove that you were aware of it to secure a conviction. This gives the defense an opening to undermine the credibility of the prosecution’s case with our own evidence and witness testimony.
- Attack the credibility and motives of the co-conspirators. Use the defense narrative to show why the co-conspirators may have given law enforcement your name to save themselves. Even if you were not an actual co-conspirator to the offense.
One call to Bilecki & Tipon could end the nightmare of conviction and give you your freedom and your life back. Your first call and the advice that comes with it is always free.
Military Defense Attorneys with Experience Fighting Back Against Article 81 Charges
We have decades of experience defending service members against court martial charges. If you or someone you love has been accused of conspiracy, finding a military criminal defense attorney with experience is critical to securing the best outcome in your case.
Bilecki & Tipon will help you fight back against charges under Article 81: Conspiracy
Frequently Asked Questions About Article 81
What If I Didn’t Know I Was Conspiring with Others to Commit a Crime?
If your defense attorneys can prove that you had no intention of conspiring with others to commit a crime, then you can be found not guilty of Article 81. For example, if two other service members ask you to drive them to a bank, where they rob it without your knowledge, and then return and ask you to drive away, then you are not a conspirator of said crime.
I Was a Conspirator of a Crime, but I Withdrew before the Crime was Committed. Am I Still Guilty?
According to Manual for Court Martial, you are not guilty of Article 81 if you “withdrew from the agreement to commit the offense before the commission of an overt act by one of the conspirators.” In this case, the overt act doesn’t have to be the crime itself or even criminal in nature. It can be any action taken by a co-conspirator that is a “manifestation that the agreement is being executed.”
You could, for example, be found not guilty of conspiracy despite having planned out the crime with your fellow co-conspirators if you took clear steps to affirmatively withdraw from the conspiracy. Planning by itself does not necessarily constitute a crime. Only upon acting out that plan can one be found guilty of conspiracy.
Does the Prosecution Have to Prove the Conspirators Succeeded in Their Goal?
No. The prosecution only has to prove that there was a conspiracy to break the law under the UCMJ.
What Is the Maximum Possible Punishment for Article 81: Conspiracy?
A Service Member found guilty of Article 81 will face maximum charges under the article of the UCMJ that was broken. For example, a Service Member conspiring with another person to commit a robbery would face the maximum sentencing under Article 122: Robbery, along with any lesser included offenses of said robbery.
The exception to this rule is the death penalty. Under no circumstance is execution a possible sentencing option for a guilty verdict under Article 81.