Most people think winning a military trial is about knowing the law. It’s not.
Military trials aren’t won by throwing legal jargon at a jury. They’re won through strategy, preparation, and the ability to tell a compelling story. The government builds its case based on legal checkboxes—whether they can meet the elements of an offense. A great defense attorney? Tears that case apart and rewrites the narrative.
I’ve been fighting military trials for over 20 years, and here’s what separates winning defense strategies from losing ones.
Winning Starts Before You Ever Step into Court
Winning isn’t about hoping you can throw together a solid defense at trial—it’s about relentless preparation.
- Understanding the file inside and out—every witness statement, every piece of evidence, every detail
- Walking the scene to know exactly where things happened, how events unfolded, and where the government’s story doesn’t add up
- Predicting the prosecution’s case—knowing how they’ll argue, what evidence they’ll rely on, and where they’re weakest
- Crafting a compelling story of innocence—because juries don’t just look at facts, they look at who they believe
A great military defense attorney isn’t just a lawyer—they’re a storyteller. A good story beats legal jargon every time.
The Government’s Case is Predictable—That’s Why We Can Beat It
The prosecution isn’t looking for the truth—they’re looking for a conviction. And they build their case the same way every time:
- Check the legal boxes – Can they meet the elements of the offense?
- Rely on the credibility deficit – Assume the jury will trust the government over the accused.
- Make the accused look guilty from the start – Push for pre-trial restrictions, paint a bad picture, and let the stigma do the work.
That’s where a great defense attorney flips the script.
- We destroy the government’s credibility deficit – Juries naturally lean toward trusting prosecutors. A winning defense strategy makes the jury start looking to us for the truth—not them.
- We flip their strongest evidence against them – A great defense attorney can take the government’s own expert witness and turn them into our witness.
- We expose their weak points – Instead of going after their strongest evidence, we target the cracks in their case, dismantling their argument one weak spot at a time.
Cross-Examination Wins Trials—Not Closing Arguments
A lot of attorneys think they can win a case in closing arguments. They’re wrong.
By the time a trial reaches closing arguments, most jurors have already made up their minds. If you’re relying on a final speech to flip the case, you’re too late.
The real fight? Happens in cross-examination.
- This is where the government’s case falls apart – Their witnesses get exposed, their evidence gets challenged, and their story starts to crumble.
- This is where the jury stops trusting the prosecution – When you break a witness on the stand, the jury starts doubting everything the government has told them.
- This is where the defense takes control – By the time we get to closing arguments, the jury should already be leaning in our favor.
If your attorney can’t dominate cross-examination, they can’t win trials. It’s that simple.
Even a Tough Case Can Be Won—If You Know Where to Attack
Let’s be real—no one hires me for easy cases.
When a service member comes to me, their case usually looks bad. But just because the evidence seems stacked against them doesn’t mean they’re guilty. It means we have to be smart.
Here’s how we turn the tide in a military trial:
- We hijack the government’s experts – They bring in a forensic expert? We cross-examine until their own testimony helps our case.
- We embrace the bad facts – Trying to ignore bad evidence makes you look weak. Owning it and explaining it builds credibility.
- We attack what’s weak, not what’s strong – We don’t waste time fighting battles we don’t need to. Instead, we target the weak spots in the prosecution’s case and dismantle them piece by piece.
Winning isn’t about arguing harder. It’s about arguing smarter.
The Most Important Decision You’ll Make in a Military Trial
If you’re facing a military trial, the single biggest factor in your case is who you hire to defend you.
Because in a courtroom, you have no voice. Your attorney speaks for you. And if you hire someone weak, inexperienced, or unprepared, you’re as good as convicted.
- Hire someone who actually wins cases – Not just someone who says they do.
- Hire someone who understands the military system – JAG lawyers rotate out every few years. You need experience.
- Hire someone who knows how to fight – Because the government isn’t playing fair, and you need a defense that can go toe-to-toe with them.
- A military trial isn’t just about guilt or innocence—it’s about survival. If you’re walking into that fight unarmed, you’re already behind.
The good news? The right defense can turn everything around.
You don’t win military trials by playing defense. You win by taking control of the narrative—and knowing exactly where to strike.
Defending Service Members Globally
Wherever Duty Calls, Our Defense Follows
