Skip to the main content

Worldwide military defenseTampa, Florida · We travel wherever the case requires.

Military defense by location

USAG Stuttgart Court Martial Defense: Defending Soldiers at Europe’s Joint Command Hub

The main gate at Patch Barracks in Stuttgart, Germany (2018).
The main gate at Patch Barracks in Stuttgart, Germany (2018).Photo: Alexander Migl · CC BY-SA 4.0
Source and image detailsPatch Barracks IMG 0744Full frame preserved. Display size reduced.

Get Free Case Evaluation

USAG Stuttgart: A Premier Posting and a Command That Cannot Afford a Scandal

In the hills of southwestern Germany, U.S. Army Garrison Stuttgart is one of the best assignments in the Army and one of the most consequential, the headquarters of both U.S. European Command and U.S. Africa Command, with Special Operations Command Europe down the road at Panzer Kaserne in Böblingen. The Soldiers here are spread across Patch, Kelley, and Panzer, and they skew senior, joint, and cleared, the staff officers, intelligence professionals, and special operations personnel who run two combatant commands. Stuttgart is also the home of Porsche and Mercedes, wine hills, and a quality of life most Soldiers would take in a heartbeat. That concentration of brass and visibility cuts against you the moment you are accused, because a command surrounded by four star headquarters cannot be seen tolerating a problem.

At a command surrounded by four star headquarters, a serious allegation gets the full weight of the institution, and you want a trial lawyer who has carried these cases before. Court martial defense is all we do, and our European caseload has grown steadily since the firm moved to Tampa. We come to Stuttgart and try the case, because what matters is the lawyer's record of winning these, not the length of his drive.

The Soldier Who Refused the Hand He Was Dealt

If you want a model for refusing to fight on someone else's terms, look at Staff Sergeant Edward A. Carter Jr. The Army shipped him to Europe and put him in a supply role, and Carter, already a combat veteran of two wars before this one, would not stay in the rear. When the call went out for support Soldiers to volunteer for the fight, he stepped forward. On March 23, 1945, near Speyer, the tank he was riding took fire, and he led a small patrol across open ground to find the enemy. Two of his men were killed and a third wounded, and Carter, hit several times himself, kept going alone, killed six of an eight man squad that came for him, and took the last two prisoner, forcing out what they knew. More than fifty years later he received the Medal of Honor. He refused to accept the outcome the situation handed him, and that is exactly the posture you need against the abuse and misuse of the UCMJ.

Why Soldiers at USAG Stuttgart Bring Us In

We win court martial cases. Military defense is all we do, and Soldiers fly us in from all over the world because of our trial record. The military justice system is not built to find the truth; it exists to preserve good order and discipline, and a headquarters command at the seat of two combatant commands will make an example of a Soldier to show the staff it holds the standard. A serious case is investigated by Army CID, and for sexual assault and other covered offenses the decision to refer charges to a court martial no longer belongs to your command but goes to an independent Special Trial Counsel. Your Trial Defense Service counsel may be capable but carries a heavy caseload inside the same system, which is why Soldiers serious about winning bring in their own counsel.

UCMJ Charges We Defend at USAG Stuttgart

This is not the whole list of what we do at USAG Stuttgart. We take every kind of court martial, and these are simply the charges that come up most.

Security Clearance and Classified Information (UCMJ Article 92 and Article 134). At the headquarters of two combatant commands, your clearance is your career, and an investigation can suspend your access long before any charge is proven. A mishandling allegation, a spillage, a security violation, or any serious charge can pull your access and put you in front of a security clearance review, which runs on a standard far below what a court martial requires and is decided not by your command but by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency. That clearance process is administrative and separate from the court martial, and it is not something we handle, but it runs on what the criminal investigation finds, so the way to protect your clearance is to fight the underlying allegation hard, which is our job.

Sexual Assault and Sex Offenses (UCMJ Article 120 / Article 134). These allegations route to an independent Special Trial Counsel now, and the command treats a report as established before the investigation is finished, all the more so at a headquarters where senior leaders watch how every case is handled. These cases demand counsel who will run an independent investigation and contest the case rather than let the allegation stand in for proof, because a conviction means confinement, a federal record, and a place on a sex offender registry.

Domestic Violence and Assault (UCMJ Articles 128b and 128). Domestic violence under Article 128b is charged as aggressively as any offense in the UCMJ since the Office of Special Trial Counsel took these cases over. It covers a spouse, an intimate partner, or a family member, and it treats strangulation or suffocation as its own charge that the government can bring even with no visible injury. A qualifying conviction also triggers the federal Lautenberg firearms bar, which can end an Army career because a Soldier has to be able to carry a weapon. We also defend assault under Article 128, where self defense is a recognized defense.

Larceny, Drugs, and Off Duty Conduct (UCMJ Articles 121, 112a, and 134). A housing allowance on the German economy or a dependent entitlement that stops matching the paperwork gets read as larceny under Article 121 stacked with a false official statement, when a finance error or a lease a Soldier genuinely misunderstood is not a scheme. Drug cases often turn on the chain of custody and the government's burden to prove any use was knowing and wrongful. A Soldier is subject to the UCMJ off duty, so a wreck on the autobahn in the Porsche or Mercedes that Stuttgart practically dares you to buy, or a night out that ends badly, can put you in front of the German Polizei and a German court as well as your command. Get counsel involved before you talk to anyone.

A Career and a Reputation Worth Defending

We will not pretend that every Soldier who calls us from Stuttgart is innocent. What matters is how serious the case is, not your rank. If a matter is genuinely minor, your Trial Defense Service counsel can handle it, and we will tell you so honestly. But when the case is serious, everything is on the line at once: your career, your clearance, your retirement, your good name, and your freedom. A court martial conviction is a federal criminal conviction, and where the sentencing parameters apply, a judge sentences within a set confinement range, two and a half to ten years for sexual assault and ten to twenty for rape, and must state specific facts in writing to support a departure, along with any required or adjudged punitive discharge and, on a covered sex offense, sex offender registration. That is why you fight. The court’s jurisdiction and the convicted offense determine which sentencing rules apply; some offenses use separate sentencing criteria rather than these ranges.

If you are facing an investigation or court martial at USAG Stuttgart, reach out for a free defense strategy session. We will tell you exactly what you are facing and how we would defend it. The government is already building its case. The only question is whether anyone is building yours.

Get Free Case Evaluation

FAQ

I hold a clearance and work a joint billet at EUCOM or AFRICOM. What does an investigation do to my access?
Your access can be suspended fast, on a standard well below the criminal one. A command or security manager who learns of a serious allegation can suspend your access and pull you from the billet before anything is proven. Revoking the clearance itself is a separate decision made by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, with a Statement of Reasons and a written response window. Because that process feeds off what the investigation finds, the underlying allegation has to be fought early, not handled as a separate problem later.

What does it mean to be titled by Army CID, and does it follow me even if I'm never charged?
Titling means CID has named you as the subject of its investigation and indexed you in a federal database. It takes only credible information that you committed an offense, a lower bar than probable cause, and it happens long before any charge or any finding of guilt. That entry can then surface in background and security clearance checks even if your case is later dropped or you are acquitted, and while a 2023 rule now lets you request that it be corrected or expunged, that is not automatic. Get counsel involved the moment CID makes contact.

My command couldn't get a court martial, so now I'm facing a GOMOR. How do I fight it?
With the rebuttal, and it is the whole fight. You typically have only a handful of duty days to answer before the imposing general decides between a local filing, which is survivable, and a permanent filing in your record, which is not. The command reaches for a GOMOR precisely because it is administrative, where a standard far lower than a court martial may permit action after the Special Trial Counsel defers, subject to the applicable restrictions. A permanent filing can lead to an officer board of inquiry or enlisted separation review, so the rebuttal is an important early opportunity, and it has to be argued with evidence, not written as a plea for sympathy.

Mr. Bilecki represented me when I was falsely accused of SA. It was a long and stressful process that was eventually dropped by the accuser. No probable cause was found at article 32, and although higher AF still decided to go to court martial, it was ultimately dropped. I was a wreck for most of this process, however, Mr. Bilecki always gave me a sense that it was all going to be ok. I completely trusted him to handle it and that sense of confidence is so crucial in that time of need.

Ronald

Ronald

Read the full testimonial

Prior results do not predict future outcomes. A prospective client may not obtain the same or similar results.