Skip to the main content

Worldwide military defenseTampa, Florida · We travel wherever the case requires.

Military defense by location

NAS Lemoore Court Martial Defense: A Hundred Miles from the Ocean, Right in the Middle of a Fight

Housing at Naval Air Station Lemoore (2022).
Housing at Naval Air Station Lemoore (2022).Photo: Jessica Nilsson · Public domain
Source and image detailsNAS Lemoore Housing Aerial viewFull frame preserved. Display size reduced.
The appearance of U.S. Department of War (DoW) visual information does not imply or constitute DoW endorsement.

Get Free Case Evaluation

NAS Lemoore: The Isolation Factor Nobody Warns You About

Naval Air Station Lemoore sits deep in California's Central Valley, about as far from the coast as a Naval Air Station can get while still being one. It is the Navy's West Coast master jet base, home to the strike fighter squadrons that fly the F-35C and the Super Hornet. The jet closes the distance to the ocean in minutes. The Sailors who live and work here do not. They are in farm country, a long drive from any real city, with limited options and a lot of downtime.

Isolation and boredom are a combination military leadership understands better than anyone, and they do not prevent it, they prosecute the consequences of it. Add a fickle command to that equation and you get good Sailors facing court martial proceedings for situations that, in a different environment, would have been handled quietly or not at all. The military justice system does not concern itself with context. It concerns itself with convictions.

Why Sailors at NAS Lemoore Fly Us In

A serious case at Lemoore is investigated by NCIS and prosecuted through Region Legal Service Office Southwest. For sexual assault, domestic violence, and other covered offenses, the charging decision no longer belongs to your command. It sits with an independent Special Trial Counsel in the Navy's Office of Special Trial Counsel. For everything else, the command and its legal office still run the case. Military prosecutors walk in with budgets, investigators, and institutional momentum. The standard JAG defense is doing its best inside a structure never designed to produce acquittals.

What changes that math is a defense that does not play by the rules the prosecution is counting on. Tim Bilecki served as an Army JAG defense counsel and then a Senior Defense Counsel before crossing to the civilian side. His firm runs independent investigations, because military investigators are notorious for sloppy work and tunnel vision, and we have found the cracks more times than we can count. Other lawyers study his work, from the closings published in Kick-Ass Closings to the cross examination he broke down for a national trial guide. When a Lemoore Sailor flies in that kind of counsel, the easy win the prosecution expected is gone.

Nine in a Single Mission

Lemoore trains the Navy's strike fighter pilots, and the Navy's greatest fighter pilot set the bar impossibly high. Commander David McCampbell finished World War II as the Navy's all time leading ace with thirty four kills, but it was two days that earned him the Medal of Honor. In June 1944, over the Philippine Sea, he led his fighters straight into a swarm of some eighty enemy planes bearing down on the fleet and personally shot down seven. Four months later, at the opening of the Battle of Leyte Gulf, he downed nine in a single mission, a record that still stands. McCampbell flew straight at numbers nobody thought survivable. That is the mindset we bring to a case at Lemoore. We fly straight at the cases that look unwinnable, because that is exactly where they get won.

The System Is Rigged, Which Is Exactly Why You Fight It

There is a version of this conversation where we tell you the truth will come out and the process will work if you stay calm and cooperate. That version is dishonest, and you deserve better. The military justice system is a conviction machine. Its purpose is not justice, it is discipline, and specifically the discipline that comes from watching a fellow Sailor get publicly destroyed. Commands need that example and prosecutors provide it. Whether you are the right person for it is a question the system is not built to ask. We show up to Article 32 hearings ready to fight, not observe, and if they want to take it all the way, we show up to court martial prepared to take their witnesses apart and make them prove their case.

UCMJ Charges We Defend at NAS Lemoore

We take on the full range of court martial charges. Below are the ones that come up most often at NAS Lemoore.

Sexual Assault and Sex Offenses (UCMJ Article 120 / Article 134). There is a good chance you know someone swept up in the military's SAPR campaign, because the numbers at installations like Lemoore have made it impossible to ignore. Commands are under relentless pressure from the Pentagon and elected officials to show they take sexual misconduct seriously, and the way they show it is by prosecuting, on the strength of allegations, rumors, and relationships gone sour rather than evidence. Even when a case cannot survive court martial scrutiny, they pursue administrative separation as a fallback because they need a result. If you are facing Article 120 or 134 charges here, your guilt has been assumed before the first hearing. That assumption has to be attacked aggressively by counsel who knows how to take apart a case built on bad evidence and institutional pressure.

Fraud and Larceny (UCMJ Article 121). BAH fraud cases out of Lemoore are usually exactly what they look like up close: administrative errors, misunderstood housing rules, or a young Sailor trying to stretch a paycheck to cover a family's real costs. Investigators do not approach these with nuance. They look for guilt and frame what they find accordingly. We have seen clerical mistakes packaged as criminal conspiracies, and we know how to take that packaging apart.

Domestic Violence and Assault (UCMJ Articles 128b and 128). Domestic violence is one of the largest parts of our caseload, and since the Office of Special Trial Counsel took these cases over, the Navy charges it as hard as a sexual assault. Article 128b covers violence against a spouse, an intimate partner, or a family member, and makes assault by strangulation or suffocation a serious charge on its own, even with no visible injury. A qualifying conviction also brings the federal Lautenberg firearms bar, which can end careers because a Sailor has to be able to carry a weapon. We also defend assault under Article 128. Put Sailors in an isolated environment with limited outlets and the occasional fight is not a surprise. It is human, and it should not be career ending. The cases that turn serious are the ones with a makeshift weapon, multiple people, or a civilian who ends up injured while our Sailor is the only one facing consequences. We defend the full range of assault charges, including self defense cases where the person in front of the court is not the one who started it.

Drug Crimes (Article 112a). California has some of the most permissive drug laws in the country. Marijuana is legal, available, and socially normalized in ways it is not in most states, which means a Lemoore Sailor who spends time off base is in an environment where civilians face zero exposure for the same conduct that could end a military career. We have defended positive urinalysis cases, possession and distribution charges, and trafficking allegations, and we have won them. That legal landscape creates genuine complexity, and complexity can be worked.

Military Specific Offenses (UCMJ Articles 77 to 134). Prosecutors load up punitive article charges for one reason: to drive the maximum sentence high enough that the plea looks irresistible. Fraternization, unauthorized absence, conduct unbecoming, disobeying a lawful order. They are broad, commonly applied, and frequently the most contestable things on the sheet. We fight them because every charge the prosecution does not get for free is one less piece of leverage over you.

The Honest Conversation About What Comes Next

Lemoore does not have a lot of distractions. What it has is some of the finest naval aviation talent in the country, and a military justice system that will burn through that talent if Sailors do not understand what they are walking into. If you are under investigation or facing a court martial, reach out. We will give you a real assessment, not a sales pitch and not false optimism: what you are facing, what is actually defensible, and what it will cost you if you do not fight, because the cost runs to your career, your retirement, your good name, and your freedom: a conviction is a federal criminal conviction. Where the sentencing parameters apply, it can carry confinement a judge has little discretion to avoid, a punitive discharge, and on a sex offense registration, at any rank. The prosecution has already started building their case. The only question is whether you will have someone building yours. The court’s jurisdiction and the convicted offense determine which sentencing rules apply; some offenses use separate sentencing criteria rather than these ranges.

Get Free Case Evaluation

FAQ

NCIS wants to interview me at Lemoore, and my command is talking about charges. Do I have to talk to them?
No to the interview without a lawyer. Under Article 31b of the UCMJ you have the right to stay silent and to counsel, and an NCIS interview is evidence collection, not your chance to clear it up; the first contact usually shapes the whole case. For covered offenses like sexual assault, the decision to refer charges to a court martial sits with an independent Special Trial Counsel in the Navy's Office of Special Trial Counsel, not your CO. The highest leverage work happens before charges are preferred, when a prepared defense can press the investigation's weaknesses with that prosecutor. Decline, ask for counsel, and call a lawyer before you say anything.

I fly or aircrew strike fighters out of Lemoore. What does an investigation do to my flight status and my wings, separate from the court martial?
It moves on its own track, usually faster than the criminal case. As the Navy's West Coast master jet base, Lemoore runs on the strike-fighter community, and an allegation can put a designated aviator or NFO in front of a Field Naval Aviator Evaluation Board (FNAEB), a separate proceeding that weighs whether you should keep your wings at all. It can clear you to keep flying, restrict you, or recommend permanently stripping your designation as a naval aviator, and a DUI or misconduct allegation can convene one even if the charge is later dropped. You lose flight pay and fly nothing while it runs, and enlisted aircrew can have their designation and quals pulled the same way. Winning the court martial does not save your wings, so the FNAEB has to be fought as its own battle from day one.

Lemoore is isolated. Does it actually matter where my civilian lawyer is based?
Not the way people fear. Lemoore sits well out in the Central Valley, the nearest real legal market is Fresno, and the local bar is thin on lawyers who try contested courts martial. Location is not the constraint: we fly in to courts martial worldwide and Lemoore is a routine trip. What matters is whether your lawyer has actually tried these cases and will come fight this one in person, at the Article 32 and at trial, rather than phone it in from a distance. That is what changes how the prosecution treats the case, not the area code.

Mr. Bilecki represented me when I was falsely accused of SA. It was a long and stressful process that was eventually dropped by the accuser. No probable cause was found at article 32, and although higher AF still decided to go to court martial, it was ultimately dropped. I was a wreck for most of this process, however, Mr. Bilecki always gave me a sense that it was all going to be ok. I completely trusted him to handle it and that sense of confidence is so crucial in that time of need.

Ronald

Ronald

Read the full testimonial

Prior results do not predict future outcomes. A prospective client may not obtain the same or similar results.