Bilecki Challenges Missing Sting Chats; Army Staff Sergeant Pleads to One of Eight Specifications

Bilecki Challenges Missing Sting Chats; Army Staff Sergeant Pleads to One of Eight Specifications

November 2023

Fort Moore, Georgia

Army Staff Sergeant – E-6

Allegations: UCMJ Article 80 Attempted Sexual Abuse of a Child / Attempted Sexual Assault of a Child / Attempted Receipt of Child Pornography (5 specifications); UCMJ Article 82 Soliciting Distribution of Child Pornography (1 specification); UCMJ Article 134 Indecent Language (2 specifications)

Facts

This was an Army Staff Sergeant facing a referred general court martial with eight specifications across three Articles arising from an undercover Army CID Kik chat operation. Maximum exposure on conviction as charged ran into decades of confinement, federal felony record, possible punitive discharge, and federal sex offender registration tier exposure on both the Article 80 sexual abuse / assault of a child specifications and the Article 82 CSAM solicitation specification.

The Government's case rested on the chat record and the meet attempt.

In February and March 2023, an Army CID Special Agent operating an undercover profile on Kik portrayed a fictitious thirteen year old girl. The Government alleged that our client, using his personal Samsung phone, exchanged sexually explicit messages with the profile across roughly three weeks, asked the profile to send a nude image, arranged to meet the profile at a basketball court behind on-post housing in March 2023, and was apprehended by CID agents at a wooded approach near the meet location. The Government's investigation included CID's full chat record, geolocation evidence, and a recorded interview.

The case was referred to general court martial in summer 2023.

Our client retained Bilecki pre-referral.

CID had run the undercover Kik profile out of an ICAC training event in December 2022. The original "onboarding" chats from that event, the records that would have shown predisposition or absence of predisposition before the charged February to March 2023 conduct, had not been preserved by CID. Tim Bilecki raised the missing chats in the defense’s Article 32 submission. Without those initial exchanges, the preserved record did not tell the whole story of how the contact began. The defense used that gap to develop the entrapment argument, challenged the age representations in the remaining messages, and objected to late discovery and the government’s proposed use of other acts. Those issues gave the defense grounds to negotiate a plea to one specification rather than all eight.

Tim Bilecki traveled to Fort Moore, Georgia for the trial. Our client pleaded guilty to one specification: attempted sexual abuse of a child involving sexual contact (the meet attempt itself). The Convening Authority dismissed the remaining seven specifications without prejudice, ripening into prejudice on completion of appellate review. The Article 82 solicitation of child pornography specification was dismissed. The Article 80 attempted sexual assault of a child specification was dismissed. The Article 80 attempted receipt of child pornography specification was dismissed. Both Article 134 indecent language specifications were dismissed. The remaining Article 80 attempted sexual abuse / indecent communication specifications were dismissed.

The plea agreement set a confinement range of four to sixteen months and required a Bad Conduct Discharge. The plea was entered to a Military Judge alone after waiver of members. The agreement removed the solicitation and attempted sexual-assault allegations from the conviction record. It required a bad-conduct discharge and limited confinement. The remaining attempted sexual-abuse conviction was still serious and carried sex-offender-registration consequences.

Result: Guilty plea to one specification of attempted sexual abuse of a child by sexual contact. The remaining specifications were withdrawn and dismissed under the plea agreement. The sentence was six months of confinement and a bad-conduct discharge.

---

FAQ

Q: Why did the missing initial chats matter?
The preserved messages began after the original contact during an ICAC training event. Bilecki raised that gap at Article 32 because those earlier exchanges could bear on who initiated the contact, what age was represented and how the conversation developed. We used that issue with the age representations, late discovery and disputed other-act evidence in negotiating the plea.

Q: What did the plea agreement accomplish?
Our client pleaded guilty to one attempted sexual-abuse specification. The other seven were withdrawn and dismissed under the agreement. The judge imposed six months of confinement and a bad-conduct discharge. The narrower conviction record and sentence were significant, but the surviving conviction still carried registration consequences.