Honolulu Military Attorney
Honolulu Military Lawyer Meet our team Our Strategy What You're Up Against Last 100 Cases Resources Frequently Asked Questions Contact our Firm
Our Expertise
High Profile Cases
Sex Crimes
Sexual Assault
Child Pornography
Confessions
Violent Crimes
Drug Cases
Larceny & Financial Fraud
Desertion & AWOL
Non-Judicial Punishment
Defending Cases WorldWide
Resources
737 Bishop Street, Mauka Suite 1530; Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Click here to visit our Blog
Click here to be instantly be connected Click here to see our videos.

Unauthorized Use of Credit Card

The issue before the CAAF in United States v. Lubasky, 68 M.J. 260 (C.A.A.F. 2010) was whether the unauthorized use of another person’s credit and bank cards constitute larceny against that person (as opposed to the financial institution?). CAAF held in the negative. The unauthorized use of credit cards cannot constitute larceny against the individual in whose name the card is issued. However, the unauthorized use of a debit card, and unauthorized access to cash from a bank account, can constitute a larceny against the account’s owner, despite the MCM commentary that such offenses usually are a larceny against the entity presenting the goods or money.

In this case, the accused, as the result of a temporary assignment as a Casualty Assistance Officer, met and became involved managing the finances of a deceased servicemember’s surviving spouse. When these duties should have ended (after the accused obtained a new ID card for the widow/victim,) the accused continued to assist her with her financial affairs. Although authorized access to the victim’s accounts only for certain specific purposes, the accused began accessing the victim’s bank accounts and credit cards for his own purposes. For this misconduct, the accused was charged with forty-three specifications of larceny under Article 121, fifteen of which resulted in convictions. On appeal to ACCA, one specification of larceny was set aside, as was a conviction for conduct unbecoming under Article 133. After a sentence re-hearing, CAAF granted review, examining the remaining fourteen specifications of larceny for legal sufficiency. These convictions, which encompassed two specifications of ATM withdrawals, five specifications of debit transactions, and seven specifications of credit-card transactions, identified the widow as the victim, not the various financial institutions that issued the cards or held the accounts.

If you have been charged with a crime and would like the legal advice of a Hawaii court martial military defense lawyer then you should contact The Bilecki Law Group today. Our legal team is available seven days a week, 24 hours a day. 

Categories: Military Defense, CAAF, Larceny
International Media Outlets

Attorney Web Design The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Address: Pacific Guardian Center | 737 Bishop Street | Mauka Tower, Suite 1530 | Honolulu, HI 96813
Phone: (808) 275-4620 and toll free at 800-996-9747